<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Following the Social Media Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mapconsultingllc.com/blog/2008/07/09/following-the-social-media-money/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mapconsultingllc.com/blog/2008/07/09/following-the-social-media-money/</link>
	<description>Quo vadis? Direct Response That Gets Results</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://mapconsultingllc.com/blog/2008/07/09/following-the-social-media-money/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mapconsultingllc.com/blog/?p=80#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Apparently, the folks at Iris are only interested in comments on their website that support the "bringing back purple" theme.  

My very polite comment that their assertion on the home page of a Grand Prize gift of a $600 gift card was incorrect (it's actually $599) wasn't approved.  

Is Iris or Sony Ericsson REALLY interested in social buzz (which always means negative or irrelevant comments, as well as positive)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, the folks at Iris are only interested in comments on their website that support the "bringing back purple" theme.  </p>
<p>My very polite comment that their assertion on the home page of a Grand Prize gift of a $600 gift card was incorrect (it's actually $599) wasn't approved.  </p>
<p>Is Iris or Sony Ericsson REALLY interested in social buzz (which always means negative or irrelevant comments, as well as positive)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.454 seconds -->
